Consent Is Law
You are born equal in standing to any other man or woman, and
therefore no power can be granted over you without your consent.
To believe otherwise is to be a slave.
There is a presumption that you give up your Right of Consent when a government is elected. However, voting does not contractually surrender your inherent right to self-determination until the next election. By voting, you simply help decide which political party will form the Executive, giving that party a conditional mandate to govern subject to your consent.
Since the government is a creation of the people, it cannot possibly have jurisdiction over its creators, unless by consent. Each and every statute enacted by government legislation requires consent from each and every man and woman, including you!
But consent is given in many ways, often unknowingly. The definition of the word “consent” includes to “yield” and to “give way to”. The moment you agree to anything you are asked to do, you are giving your consent. If you get a parking ticket it is an invitation to pay, and if you pay it you are consenting to the ticket contract. Even the Police need your consent. Before an officer can arrest you they must read you your rights and then ask “do you understand” (stand under their authority), and if you say “yes” – you are consenting.
All statutes, codes, rules, regulations, and so-called by-“laws”, are commercial contracts written by your government that require your informed consent. Any State document requiring a signature is a contract by consent. If you do not consent to a statutory contract, it is not enforceable on you.
Any attempt to make you consent is coercion. Any threat to make you “sign” a contract is extortion. Any “legal person actor” who attempts to compel you into “joinder” to the legal fiction “artificial person” without the “full disclosure” of any information that may influence your decision whether or not to consent, commits a “Crime involving deceit”, under Section 240 of the NZ Crimes Act.
An “artificial person” is a fictional creation of the State, and therefore it is controlled by the State. The legal fiction “person” is the government's property, employee, servant, franchise, debtor, surety for liabilities, bound to comply with the government's statutes (acts, bills, rules and legislative instruments), which are the “terms and conditions” of that “status”.
Fictional creatures of the State have “status”, whereas living men and women with flesh and blood arms and legs have “standing”. The “artificial person” has no “standing”. The entire concept of fictional entities is an abstraction of the mind. It is an illusion that depends utterly upon your consent. It is un-natural, and joining to a fiction is a deadly corruption of life.
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any [government] law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators
[Note. A government as an artificial person is created by incorporation, a process of legalisation through registration into the legal fiction system of commerce.]
The word person is a derivative of persona, which is a theatrical “mask” worn by actors in Greek drama. “Persons” are “actors” often “performing” roles in “costumes” (uniforms) who enact “language” (legalese) to deliver “presentations” (bills), and sometimes they “appear” in a court (theatre).
Any living man or woman who consents (knowingly or unknowingly) to “act” in the “role” of an “artificial person” is an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to the “artificial person”. This “joinder” creates an inferior “indivisible duo” (individual), surrendering the living jurisdiction (de jure lawful), and replacing it with the statutory jurisdiction (de facto legal).
Joinder: When a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they are an “accommodation party” invoking “joinder” to that “artificial person”. They are “acting” in a fictional persona. Their jurisdiction changes to that of an “artificial person” and they are therefore bound by the Statutes that control “artificial persons”. When an official asks for your name, address, and date of birth, this is to establish the NAME and address of the “artificial person” - the “person”, and the date it was created or “birthed” (berthed). Men and women are “born”, and have a living “born identity”, which is of no use to an official. Once “joinder” (consent) has been established, the official has jurisdiction and can offer and enforce contracts, imposing violations and fines. An official can obtain jurisdiction over you by asking “Do you understand?” (stand under my authourity). Withholding your family name ALWAYS avoids “joinder”, and is your Right in Law.
The statutes, which are not “laws” but contract instruments originally meant to provide common governance to living people by consent, have been corrupted to extract “commercial energy” (credit) from the living people via fictional legal persons.
A contract is a voluntary agreement between two or more parties with the intention of creating a legal/lawful obligation. An “express contract” is one which has the terms and conditions specifically stated, orally or in writing. An “implied contract” is one which has the terms and conditions inferred, in whole or in part, from conduct or circumstances rather than from written or spoken words. The only difference between an “implied contract” and an “express contract” is the way that mutual assent is given. Be very careful, because your consent can be obtained by your action or in-action, including your silence (acquiescence). Your consent is PRESUMED by your silence, unless you say: “It ain't me.”
SILENCE. the State of a person who does not speak, or of one who refrains from speaking.
2. Pure and simple silence cannot be considered as a consent to a contract, except in cases when the silent person is bound in good faith to explain himself, in which case, silence gives consent. [Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition]
Contract Law is based on the precepts of Common Law, which simply oblige men and women not to cause harm or loss, or to deceive other men and women by denying them their Living Rights. Common Law is Common Sense.
Your Right to
Contract, or Not to Contract,
is INVIOLABLE and
UNLIMITED.
There is a presumption that you give up your Right of Consent when a government is elected. However, voting does not contractually surrender your inherent right to self-determination until the next election. By voting, you simply help decide which political party will form the Executive, giving that party a conditional mandate to govern subject to your consent.
Since the government is a creation of the people, it cannot possibly have jurisdiction over its creators, unless by consent. Each and every statute enacted by government legislation requires consent from each and every man and woman, including you!
But consent is given in many ways, often unknowingly. The definition of the word “consent” includes to “yield” and to “give way to”. The moment you agree to anything you are asked to do, you are giving your consent. If you get a parking ticket it is an invitation to pay, and if you pay it you are consenting to the ticket contract. Even the Police need your consent. Before an officer can arrest you they must read you your rights and then ask “do you understand” (stand under their authority), and if you say “yes” – you are consenting.
The origin of all
LEGAL jurisdiction over YOU
is YOUR given
consent.
All statutes, codes, rules, regulations, and so-called by-“laws”, are commercial contracts written by your government that require your informed consent. Any State document requiring a signature is a contract by consent. If you do not consent to a statutory contract, it is not enforceable on you.
Any attempt to make you consent is coercion. Any threat to make you “sign” a contract is extortion. Any “legal person actor” who attempts to compel you into “joinder” to the legal fiction “artificial person” without the “full disclosure” of any information that may influence your decision whether or not to consent, commits a “Crime involving deceit”, under Section 240 of the NZ Crimes Act.
When “acting” in
the “role” of an “artificial person”
you are contracting
to give a “performance”.
An “artificial person” is a fictional creation of the State, and therefore it is controlled by the State. The legal fiction “person” is the government's property, employee, servant, franchise, debtor, surety for liabilities, bound to comply with the government's statutes (acts, bills, rules and legislative instruments), which are the “terms and conditions” of that “status”.
Fictional creatures of the State have “status”, whereas living men and women with flesh and blood arms and legs have “standing”. The “artificial person” has no “standing”. The entire concept of fictional entities is an abstraction of the mind. It is an illusion that depends utterly upon your consent. It is un-natural, and joining to a fiction is a deadly corruption of life.
Maxim of Law:
Disparata non debent
jungi.
Unequal things
ought not to be joined.
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any [government] law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators
[Note. A government as an artificial person is created by incorporation, a process of legalisation through registration into the legal fiction system of commerce.]
The word person is a derivative of persona, which is a theatrical “mask” worn by actors in Greek drama. “Persons” are “actors” often “performing” roles in “costumes” (uniforms) who enact “language” (legalese) to deliver “presentations” (bills), and sometimes they “appear” in a court (theatre).
Any living man or woman who consents (knowingly or unknowingly) to “act” in the “role” of an “artificial person” is an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to the “artificial person”. This “joinder” creates an inferior “indivisible duo” (individual), surrendering the living jurisdiction (de jure lawful), and replacing it with the statutory jurisdiction (de facto legal).
“Joinder” to an
“artificial person” removes
the lawful
standing of a Man or Woman.
Joinder: When a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they are an “accommodation party” invoking “joinder” to that “artificial person”. They are “acting” in a fictional persona. Their jurisdiction changes to that of an “artificial person” and they are therefore bound by the Statutes that control “artificial persons”. When an official asks for your name, address, and date of birth, this is to establish the NAME and address of the “artificial person” - the “person”, and the date it was created or “birthed” (berthed). Men and women are “born”, and have a living “born identity”, which is of no use to an official. Once “joinder” (consent) has been established, the official has jurisdiction and can offer and enforce contracts, imposing violations and fines. An official can obtain jurisdiction over you by asking “Do you understand?” (stand under my authourity). Withholding your family name ALWAYS avoids “joinder”, and is your Right in Law.
YOUR given consent
by SILENT acquiescence
makes a CONTRACT in
commercial law.
The statutes, which are not “laws” but contract instruments originally meant to provide common governance to living people by consent, have been corrupted to extract “commercial energy” (credit) from the living people via fictional legal persons.
Maxim of Law:
Consensus
facit legem. Consent makes the law.
A contract is a law
between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
A contract is a voluntary agreement between two or more parties with the intention of creating a legal/lawful obligation. An “express contract” is one which has the terms and conditions specifically stated, orally or in writing. An “implied contract” is one which has the terms and conditions inferred, in whole or in part, from conduct or circumstances rather than from written or spoken words. The only difference between an “implied contract” and an “express contract” is the way that mutual assent is given. Be very careful, because your consent can be obtained by your action or in-action, including your silence (acquiescence). Your consent is PRESUMED by your silence, unless you say: “It ain't me.”
SILENCE. the State of a person who does not speak, or of one who refrains from speaking.
2. Pure and simple silence cannot be considered as a consent to a contract, except in cases when the silent person is bound in good faith to explain himself, in which case, silence gives consent. [Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition]
Contract Law is based on the precepts of Common Law, which simply oblige men and women not to cause harm or loss, or to deceive other men and women by denying them their Living Rights. Common Law is Common Sense.
